History Erased? Why Mughal Rulers Are Disappearing From School Textbooks

πŸ“œ #HistoryRewritten #IndianEducation #MughalHistory #TextbookControversy #NCERTChanges #SaveHistory #IndianHeritage


The Big Change: Mughals Out, Who’s In?

The Times of India recently reported that Mughal emperors like Akbar, Jahangir, and Shah Jahan have been removed from Class 7 history textbooks in India. This decision by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has sparked debates among historians, educators, and politicians.

What’s Gone?

🚫 Deleted Topics:

  • Detailed chapters on Mughal administration, art, and architecture
  • Key rulers like Babur, Humayun, Akbar, and Aurangzeb (reduced to brief mentions)
  • Cultural syncretism (e.g., Akbar’s Din-i-Ilahi, Sufi-Bhakti movements)

What’s Added?

βœ… New Focus Areas:

  • Ancient Indian empires (Mauryas, Guptas, Cholas)
  • Regional kingdoms (Marathas, Ahoms, Vijayanagara)
  • Freedom struggle (1857 Revolt, Gandhian era)

⚑ Why the Change?

NCERT claims this is part of a β€œrationalization” process to:

  1. Reduce syllabus load post-COVID.
  2. Balance historical narratives (more focus on indigenous rulers).
  3. Avoid β€œoverlapping” topics across classes.

Critics Say:

  • β€œWhitewashing history”: Mughals ruled for 300+ yearsβ€”can’t be ignored.
  • Political agenda?: Some see this as downplaying Islamic influence on India.
  • Loss of cultural context: Taj Mahal, Red Fort, and Urdu poetry stem from Mughal era.

πŸ“š What Do Historians Think?

  • Prof. Irfan Habib (Aligarh Muslim University):
    β€œYou can’t teach medieval India without Mughals. It’s like teaching Rome without Caesar.”
  • Dr. Ruchika Sharma (JNU):
    β€œFocus on regional kings is good, but erasure isn’t the solution.”

πŸ‘¨β€πŸŽ“ Student & Parent Reactions

  • Confusion: How will kids understand monuments like Fatehpur Sikri or Jama Masjid?
  • Mixed feelings: Some welcome less β€œforeign rule” focus; others fear biased learning.

🌍 Global Parallels

This isn’t just an India issue:

  • USA: Debates over teaching slavery & colonialism.
  • UK: β€œEmpire nostalgia” vs. colonial atrocities.
  • Japan: Downplaying WWII war crimes in textbooks.

πŸ’‘ The Big Question: Should History Be Selective?

βœ” Pros:

  • Highlights neglected Indian empires.
  • Reduces rote learning burden.
    ❌ Cons:
  • Risks creating gaps in historical understanding.
  • May fuel communal divides.

πŸ“’ Your Opinion Matters!

  • Should Mughals be taught in schools?
  • Is this β€œsyllabus rationalization” or rewriting history?

πŸ’¬ Comment below!

πŸ”— Read the full TOI report here: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indian-rulers-in-mughals-out-of-std-7-textbooks/articleshow/120679357.cms


🚨 Share This Story!

πŸ“Œ Tag educators, historians, and policymakers.
πŸ“Œ Use hashtags: #TeachMughals #IndianHistoryDebate

(Sources: TOI, NCERT, historian interviews)

P.S. Want balanced history resources? Check out:

“History isn’t just about kingsβ€”it’s about truth. Let’s preserve it.”



Leave a comment